Monday, January 6, 2014

Home Page

 If you think the Sex Offender Registry is not unconstitutional; than please leave this webpage, now; by official decree, of the author of this webpage.

New Blogs Part 14

If you believe it is ok to deny registered sex offenders human rights or U.S. Constitutional rights. If you do not believe registered sex offenders are denied their human and constitutional rights or if you are against free speech. 
Please leave this web page now. Thank you.

By remaining on this web page you here by acknowledge that you support human rights and United States constitutional rights for registered sex offenders and that you support freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech is understood to be fundamental in a democracy. The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights.
This blog is not for people to be critical of what is posted here and if the reader is critical of anything here than that means they did not read the disclaimer on the top of each of the pages here and are not welcome here and should stop reading and leave this blog upon my request and in the name of freedom of speech, and my rights as a American citizen.
No sexual abuse is ever acceptable. Sex offense laws and policies should be based on sound research and common sense, not fear, panic or paranoia. Current laws and policies that paint all sex offenders with one broad brush are counter- productive, wasteful, and cause needless harm. Each offense must be judged on its own merits with a punishment that fits the crime and does not waste taxpayer dollars. The public sex offender registry and residency restriction laws do not protect children but instead ostracize and dehumanize individuals and their families. Money spent on purely punitive measures would be better used for prevention, healing, and rehabilitation. 
The author of SO FAQ does not affiliate with any other organization or people on the internet or the world for that matter. I have been saying this since I first logged on to the internet. Just because I like organizations like the ACLU; does not mean I believe in everything they believe in or stand for. Just like in our great country when we vote; we will never believe in everything the candidate we vote for; believes in or stands for. That doe not mean we are should not vote.


Hey, this blog looks real nice on a cell phone; as I have recently discovered.
Below is a great example of my typos. I had the wrong words on the top of pages on this blog for almost 2 years. All I can say, is like I always say: no one pays me for this and I have no one helping me; at all, (like my art work) so my typos are just are part of my journalist attempts.:

New Blogs Part 14 Updated September 08 2022
I just removed a paragraph that started with these words.: Some of these articles are just plan communist propaganda. That was there by mistake. It was to be a disclaimer for my old Alternative Military News Now blog that I took down because I just got sick of war news.
New Blogs Part 13 Updated April 17 2022
Since part of the theme of this blog is against sexual assaults; I am going to post these stories I have found on Google News. Since they are just plain too disgusting to post (they still need to be read by people in authority of such things especially)  in detail I am going to present them just how you you find them in Google News. Click here.

This is a example of how we are destroying our country by mainly ignoring the Constitution of the United Sates. It is also a example of how the very same thing that is happening in the Ukraine may someday happen here. 

Updated February 14th 2026
I unpublished a bunch of pages from this blog because my political view have changed over the past couple of years. 
I still am very much against the cruel and unusual punishment of the SOR. Possible it could be justified against a extremely small portion of men who could not control their insatiable want to molest people. To apply the SOR the way it is now is a travesty of justice and could very well contribute the end of our country as we know it.